By AJAAT
The State of
the World’s Children Report of 2008, in the National
Road Map Strategic Plan, 2008-2015, affirms that spacing interval between
pregnancies could reduce 20-25% of all maternal deaths.
Additional
statistics reveal that about one third of 536,000
maternal deaths each year could be averted if women had access to reliable
family planning methods and at least one third of the 190
million unintentional pregnancies could be avoided with availability of FP
methods.
It is
believed that nearly 50 million women who resort to abortion, of which, 19
million are performed under unsafe conditions, could be prevented had the women
been accessible to reliable reproductive health services.
Statistics
prove that an estimated 68,000 women that die every year as a result of unsafe
abortions and the millions more who suffer infections and complications such as
infertility as a consequence of these abortions could be saved had there been
sufficient supplies of reproductive health commodities.
In spite of
their importance, sufficient evidence exists to suggest that there is limited
supply of reproductive commodities in those countries.
While some
200 million women in resource-constrained countries would have liked to have an
interval of two years before giving another birth, such wishes are hard to
come-by because of these women not having access to modern contraception.
The World
Health Organization (WHO), 1997 report states that over 99% of 585,000 women
death during pregnancy or immediately after giving birth or after an induced
abortion occur in low-income countries yearly where unsafe abortion is named as
the major contributor to maternal mortality.
Abortion is
a procedure performed either by a person lacking the necessary skills or in an
environment lacking minimal medical standards or both – is a major contributor
to maternal mortality.
The WHO 1994
report states that unsafe abortions are responsible for 50000–100000
preventable deaths each year world-wide and in addition there are millions of
women who are suffering from chronic morbidities and disabilities as a
consequence of unsafe abortions.
Roke and
Rogerson (2008), defining What Are Essential Reproductive Health Supplies;
showed that despite large efforts in enhancing the supplies of reproductive
commodities in the Pacific region, end-users still reported receiving them
inconsistently besides the goods being unsuitable and lacking quality.
The United
Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), statement on RHCS Challenges in 19th
October, 2000, shows that not only have poor countries left the task of funding
for these commodities to development partners, but also that international
donor support has been declining.
There are
numerous reasons that are attributable to the situation of reproductive health
commodities being insufficient. One is that of funding. Donor support in the commodities dropped from
$560 million in 1995 to $460 million in 2003.
The Global
Programme to Enhance Reproductive Health Commodity Security reveals the same
trend between 2007 and 2013, the amount needed was $750,000,000 only
$208,528,277 was receives while $170,041,267 was pledged and still $371,430,456
was needed.
Because of
such shortage, ‘Tracking Donor Support’ notes that donor support would nearly
need to double if the current unmet need is to be met by 2015.
But equally
important is the question of supply of the commodities, which is dependent on a
number of things, including forecasting, financing, procurement, and
distribution capacities.
The
Reproductive Health Supply Chain report states that for each of the goods to be
well-forecasted, well-financed, well-procured, and well-distributed, good data
are needed on consumption on how much is required of those commodities and on stock
status to how much is left.
To have the
right consumption data and the right knowledge on the stock status, it requires
effective systems of collecting and storing information, which in a word may be
referred to as effective Logistics Management Information System to facilitate
better forecasting of future needs.
Accurate
determination of funding requirements, improved establishment of the right
quantities to be ordered and procured and enhancing management of distribution
so as to avoid shortages.
Why should
resources allocated for contraceptive be limited? Is it because contraceptives
are not prioritized in our development plan? Why is there inadequate
forecasting capacity? Why is it that the coordination system is not well
organized?
The emerging
question is: could the situation be the same for the reproductive health
commodities such as EMOC drugs (Oxytocin, Ferrous/Zinc Sulphate, Ergometrine,
Misoprostol, SP for pregnant women) and vaccines for children under Expanded
Programme for Immunization (EPI), including BCG, TT, Measles, and Low
Osmolarity ORS, as it is for FP commodities; COC, POP, Implants, IUCD,
Injectables, and condoms?
This column is a contribution by Advance
Family Planning (AFP), a coalition of 10 local Non-Governmental Organizations
(NGOs) advocating for family planning access to Tanzania. The project’s thrust
is to contribute towards strengthening investments in family planning as a way
towards attaining national and Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 4 and 5 in
Acceleration of the Reduction of Maternal, Newborn and Child Mortality.